Ravens 41, Packers 24: Henry’s Dominant Run Game
I still remember watching this one live and thinking: I haven’t seen a backfield that physical at Lambeau in a long time. On November 18, 2023, the Ravens steamrolled the Packers 41-24, and I want to walk you through the uglier, the flashier, and the tiny moments that changed everything. I’ll be frank — I cheered for the thrills (Malik Willis’s scrambles) and grimaced at the defensive collapse Ravens 41, Packers 24: Henry’s Dominant .
Game snapshot: Ravens 41, Packers 24: Henry’s Dominant Run Game
In this Ravens vs Packers matchup at Lambeau Field on November 18, 2023, Baltimore delivered a statement win, finishing a Final Score 41-24 that felt like a late-season, Week 17-style signature game. From my view, the headline wasn’t just the points—it was how the Ravens controlled the game with the run and with the clock, turning steady drives into a constant grind for Green Bay’s defense.
Quick facts that shaped the Packers vs Ravens recap
- Final: Ravens 41, Packers 24
- Date/setting: November 18, 2023, Lambeau Field
- Ravens plays: 74
- Ravens total yards: 414
- Ravens rushing yards: 307 (a massive spike from their usual output)
- Time of possession: Ravens 40:16 vs Packers 19:44
- Turnovers: Ravens had no turnovers; Green Bay miscues hurt any comeback path
- Records after the game: Ravens 8-8, Packers 9-6-1
How Baltimore won: volume, rushing, and possession
Baltimore’s numbers tell the story in a simple way: 74 plays, 414 yards, and about 307 rushing yards. That rushing total was extraordinary—nearly triple a typical team’s weekly ground output—and it ranked among the most rushing yards Green Bay has ever allowed. The Ravens didn’t need to be flashy; they just kept stacking first downs, leaning on Derrick Henry and an offensive line that consistently moved the line of scrimmage Ravens 41, Packers 24: Henry’s Dominant .
The possession split—40:16 to 19:44—was just as important. When one team holds the ball for roughly two-thirds of the game, it changes everything: defensive legs fade, pass rush slows, and tackling gets sloppy. That’s exactly the kind of environment a power run game wants Ravens 41, Packers 24: Henry’s Dominant.
Bill Huber: “This wasn’t a fluke — the Ravens dominated the line of scrimmage and turned that into points.”
Green Bay’s bursts weren’t enough
In this Packers vs Ravens recap, I can’t ignore that Green Bay did have moments—especially with Malik Willis creating offense with his arm and legs. But those bursts came in shorter windows, while Baltimore’s offense stayed on schedule for long stretches. The Packers’ playoff position took a hit at 9-6-1, sliding after a third straight loss, while the 8-8 Ravens kept themselves in the AFC North mix by winning in a style that travels: run the ball, protect it, and own the clock Ravens 41, Packers 24: Henry’s Dominant.
Henry leads Ravens: a masterclass in goal-line power
When I look back at Ravens 41, Packers 24, one thing stands above everything else: Henry leads Ravens with a run game that never let Green Bay breathe. Baltimore didn’t just lean on the ground attack—they built the entire win around it, piling up 307 rushing yards, a number that nearly tripled their season pace in this outing. The centerpiece was simple and overwhelming: Derrick Henry rushed again and again until the Packers cracked.
Derrick Henry carried the load: 36 carries, 216 yards rushing, four TDs
Ravens 41, Packers 24: Henry’s Dominant The box score almost reads like a throwback. Henry finished with 36 carries, 216 yards rushing, and four rushing touchdowns. That workload wasn’t empty volume, either—it was the primary driver of Baltimore’s win because it controlled the clock, set up manageable downs, and kept the Ravens in command of the game’s tempo Ravens 41, Packers 24: Henry’s Dominant.
| Stat | Result |
| Carries | 36 |
| Yards | 216 |
| Rushing TDs | 4 |
Goal-line efficiency and short-yardage power were decisive
What hit me most was how automatic Baltimore felt near the goal line. Henry cashed in with short scoring runs—3 yards, 1 yard, and 3 yards—the kind of punches that don’t look flashy but break a defense’s will. The Ravens’ play-calling stayed committed to that identity, trusting their line and their back to win inches, then yards, then touchdowns Ravens 41, Packers 24: Henry’s Dominant.
Bill Huber: “Watching Henry at Lambeau was like watching a freight train find fresh track — unstoppable on the goal line.”
The late 25-yard touchdown that iced it
Even after all the grinding work, Henry still had the burst to finish the game with a statement. His 25-yard touchdown late was the closer—one run that turned a tense finish into a sealed result. It also showed the cumulative effect of the earlier pounding: by the fourth quarter, Green Bay’s fits were slower and their tackling angles were wider Ravens 41, Packers 24: Henry’s Dominant Ravens 41, Packers 24: Henry’s Dominant.
Offensive line dominance turned short gains into big ones
I can’t separate Henry’s production from what Baltimore’s offensive line did. Lanes were consistently available, and contact often came a step late. That’s how routine carries became chunk plays, including a 30-yard burst that underlined how the Packers’ front was losing leverage. By the end, Green Bay had allowed one of its worst rushing totals in team history, and Henry’s physical style—breaking tackles and finishing runs—forced them to creep extra bodies into the box, opening space elsewhere even when the Ravens stayed run-first Ravens 41, Packers 24: Henry’s Dominant.
Ravens rushing attack: scheme, line play, and numbers
Ravens rushing attack analysis: a clock-first plan
I saw a clear theme in Baltimore’s approach: grinding drives and clock control came first, and everything else flowed from that. The Ravens didn’t chase quick strikes early—they leaned into the Ravens rushing attack to set the tempo, shorten the game, and keep Green Bay’s defense on the field until it wore down. That plan showed up immediately in the first half, when Baltimore stacked long possessions and kept the Packers stuck reacting instead of attacking.
The result was the kind of workload that breaks a front seven over four quarters. Baltimore ran 74 plays and produced 414 total yards, which tells me the offense wasn’t living on a few explosive moments—it was sustained, physical, and repeatable. More importantly, the Ravens controlled possession with drive length and play volume, forcing Green Bay to defend run fits again and again.
Line play and blocks: “set the tone” football
The biggest difference wasn’t just Derrick Henry’s power; it was how often the offensive line created clean angles and movement at the point of attack. I noticed consistent leverage wins, plus timely pulling action that helped Henry get downhill before contact. When Green Bay tried to tighten gaps, Baltimore stayed patient and kept calling runs that stressed the edges and the interior on alternating snaps.
John Harbaugh: “Our line set the tone — we stayed physical and trusted the run plan all day.”
That quote fits what the tape and the numbers both suggest: Baltimore trusted the same core ideas until the Packers cracked. With no turnovers, the Ravens avoided the one thing that can derail a run-heavy script—giving away possessions and letting the opponent reset.
Numbers that explain the fatigue
The box score reads like a blueprint for wearing out a defense. Baltimore finished with 307 rushing yards as a team, nearly tripling its season pace in this game, and Derrick Henry alone piled up 216 yards on 36 carries with four rushing touchdowns. That kind of volume matters because it forces tackling reps, and tackling reps add up Ravens 41, Packers 24: Henry’s Dominant.
| Category | Ravens |
| Rushing yards | 307 |
| Total plays | 74 |
| Total yards | 414 |
| Turnovers | 0 |
Complementary pieces: Huntley and Flowers punished overcommitment
What made the Ravens rushing attack even harder to survive was the way Baltimore mixed in misdirection and timely passes once Green Bay started selling out. Tyler Huntley’s role mattered here: he added a rushing threat and delivered the key complementary strike—his 10-yard touchdown to Zay Flowers. To me, that’s the payoff of the plan: run to set the tempo, then use play-action and quick throws when the defense is tired and desperate.
Packers offense analysis: Malik Willis shines amid chaos
Malik Willis performance kept the game from getting away early
My biggest takeaway from this Ravens 41, Packers 24 loss is that the Packers offense had a real spark, even while everything around it felt unstable. With Jordan Love in concussion protocol, Malik Willis stepped in and delivered a sharp, confident outing. The raw numbers tell the story: 18-of-21 passing for 288 yards, plus nine rushes for 60 yards and two rushing touchdowns. For long stretches, it felt like Willis was the only reason Green Bay could trade punches with Baltimore’s run-heavy attack.
What stood out most in this Packers offense analysis was how Willis used his legs to create answers when the Ravens’ front tightened up. His 22-yard touchdown run wasn’t just a highlight—it was a reminder that the offense can change shape when the quarterback is a real run threat. It also helped Green Bay stay within striking distance in the first half, even as Baltimore controlled the clock and kept the Packers on the sideline Ravens 41, Packers 24: Henry’s Dominant.
Big-play passing showed up, led by Christian Watson 113
Willis didn’t just scramble; he pushed the ball downfield. The receiver group benefited from that aggressive mindset, and the clearest example was Christian Watson 113 yards on the night. Watson finished with five catches for 113 yards and a touchdown, consistently giving Green Bay chunk plays when it needed them most. I liked the way Willis trusted Watson on deeper routes and let him win in space, because it’s the kind of connection that can keep defenses from crowding the line.
Those explosive gains mattered because the Packers weren’t living on long, methodical drives. They needed quick strikes to match a Ravens offense that was bleeding the clock with Derrick Henry. When Willis hit those deep shots, it felt like Green Bay could still make the game uncomfortable for BaltimoreRavens 41, Packers 24: Henry’s Dominant.
Late momentum died with injuries and turnovers
The frustrating part is that the comeback window never fully opened, and it wasn’t only because Baltimore kept running. The Packers’ late-game adjustments got undermined by two things:
- Willis leaving with a shoulder injury, which changed the feel of the offense immediately.
- Clayton Tune’s interception after he entered, a turnover that erased any chance to build pressure in the final stretch.
Bill Huber: “Willis gave us a glimpse of what this offense can do when he moves — but defense and depth issues remain.”
Even with the loss, Willis’s outing was a bright spot. At one point, he was essentially carrying the production himself, and that’s not a small thing against a team that controlled possession the way Baltimore did.
Packers defensive breakdown & time-of-possession collapse
When I rewatch this game, the story is simple: the Packers defensive breakdown wasn’t one bad series—it was a full-game failure to control the line of scrimmage. Baltimore piled up massive Ravens rushing yards (over 300), which sits among the ugliest run-defense days in Packers history. Derrick Henry didn’t need trick plays or perfect looks. He got downhill, stayed on schedule, and kept the Packers stuck in survival mode.
Packers defensive struggles: gap control and tackling fell apart
The biggest issue I saw was basic run defense. Green Bay repeatedly lost gap integrity, and once a crease opened, tackling didn’t clean it up. Baltimore’s offensive line consistently created movement, and Henry punished arm tackles and late fits. This wasn’t just “Henry being Henry”—it was a front seven that couldn’t reset the line or force the run to bounce.
- Poor gap discipline: defenders overran lanes and opened cutback space.
- Missed tackles: first contact rarely ended the play, turning 3-yard gains into 8-12.
- No slowdown on early downs: Baltimore stayed ahead of the chains and kept the playbook wide open.
Bill Huber: “We watched the trenches lose repeatedly. That’s a defensive breakdown more than a single play issue.”
Time-of-possession collapse created defensive fatigue
The possession numbers explain why the cracks became craters. Baltimore held the ball for about 40:16 compared to Green Bay’s 19:44. In the first half alone, the Ravens ran 45 plays to the Packers’ 14 and held it for nearly 24 minutes. That kind of imbalance creates defensive fatigue, and fatigue shows up as slow reads, soft edges, and poor tackling angles—exactly what I saw as the game wore on.
| Category | Ravens | Packers |
| Time of possession | ~40:16 | ~19:44 |
| Turnovers | 0 | 2 |
Turnover margin kept the defense trapped
The turnover margin was decisive because it fed the same cycle: short fields, more snaps, more rushing attempts, and less recovery time. Green Bay gave it away twice, while Baltimore played clean with zero turnovers. Even when Malik Willis and the offense flashed, the defense rarely got the kind of quick stop that flips momentum. Instead, Baltimore’s long, physical drives forced Green Bay to defend every blade of grass, and the late 25-yard Henry touchdown felt like the final result of a defense that had been on the field too long.
Turning points, wild cards, and the human element
Game Highlights that flipped the script early
The biggest turning point wasn’t one snap—it was the way Baltimore stacked winning snaps on top of each other. Derrick Henry’s second touchdown drive felt like the moment the game’s shape hardened. The Ravens didn’t just score; they stayed on the field. They went 5-for-5 on first-half possessions, and Henry’s first-half line (21 carries for 106 yards) told the story of steady force. Green Bay had answers—like the Malik Willis scramble that turned into a 22-yard touchdown run—but every time the Packers landed a punch, Baltimore responded with another long, draining drive Ravens 41, Packers 24: Henry’s Dominant.
That early and sustained efficiency made any comeback plan uphill. When an offense keeps converting, the defense starts pressing, and small gaps become big lanes. It matched what I saw all night: Baltimore’s line leaning forward, Green Bay’s front trying to reset, and Henry falling forward even when the first hit arrived on time.
The wild card: if Willis stays healthy, does the ending change?
I keep coming back to the “what if” of Willis’s shoulder injury. Before he got banged up, he was playing clean and fast—at one point he completed 8-of-8 in a stretch, and the Malik Willis scramble element forced Baltimore to respect the edges. In an alternate timeline where he stays healthy, I can see Green Bay leaning harder into tempo, using quick throws to Christian Watson, and treating Willis’s legs like a built-in answer against Baltimore’s pass rush.
Does that flip the final score? Maybe not, because the run defense problem didn’t go away. But it could have changed the pressure late—fewer desperate throws, fewer forced decisions, and maybe no need to reach for a third quarterback when the game tightened Ravens 41, Packers 24: Henry’s Dominant.
Lambeau’s mood swing: momentum you can feel
Midgame, I jotted a note about the crowd: “Noise fades when the defense can’t get off the field.” Lambeau starts loud, but long, methodical drives have a way of quieting even the best stadiums. Each Ravens first down felt like a small subtraction—less energy, less belief, more frustration. Momentum isn’t magic; it’s often just time of possession made emotional.
The closing seal: Huntley touchdown pass, then the final mistake
The Huntley touchdown pass to Zay Flowers for 10 yards was the clean punctuation on Baltimore’s control, pushing the lead and forcing Green Bay into a narrower script. From there, injuries and late miscues finished the Packers’ chances, and Clayton Tune’s interception became the final stamp on a night where daily variables mattered as much as game plan Ravens 41, Packers 24: Henry’s Dominant.
Bill Huber: “Small moments — a missed tackle here, a sealed extra yard there — snowballed into the final difference.”
That’s how I’ll remember it: not just Henry’s power, but how quickly the game demanded perfection from Green Bay—and how human it looked when they couldn’t meet it.
TL;DR: Ravens controlled possession and ran for 307 yards (Derrick Henry 216 on 36 carries, 4 TDs) to beat Packers 41-24. Malik Willis shone (18/21, 288 yards; 2 rush TDs) but Green Bay’s defense couldn’t contain the run. Packers fall to 9-6-1; Ravens 8-8.